<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Contesting Strategies Latest Topics</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/forum/39-contesting-strategies/</link><description>Contesting Strategies Latest Topics</description><language>en</language><item><title>SO2R actually worth the headache? thinking about setting it up for sweepstakes</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4991-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-thinking-about-setting-it-up-for-sweepstakes/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing single op assisted for a few years now and consistently finishing in the upper tier of my section but i keep hitting this wall around 800-900 QSOs in SS phone where i just cant seem to squeeze more rate out of the setup. been reading a lot about SO2R and honestly it sounds like either a game changer or a complete nightmare depending on who you ask.</p><p>my current setup is an ic-7300 as the main rig and i have an older ft-950 sitting on the shelf doing nothing. the antenna situation is two separate dipoles on different bands so at least that part seems workable. what i dont really get is how people manage the intermod between the two radios when theyre both transmitting. like do you just accept some noise or is there actual filtering hardware you need to buy before this is even viable.</p><p>also genuinely curious whether the rate improvement is real or whether its one of those things that sounds better in theory. ive seen claimed rates of 200+ per hour from the big SO2R guys and i cant tell if thats because of SO2R specifically or just because theyre better operators running better stations in better locations.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4991</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R worth it for casual contesters or just overkill at this point</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4949-so2r-worth-it-for-casual-contesters-or-just-overkill-at-this-point/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests seriously for maybe 3 years now and im pretty comfortable with single radio operating, usually pulling decent numbers in things like CQWW and sweepstakes. but i keep reading about SO2R and watching some of the top scores and wondering if i should even bother going down that road or if its just one of those things that sounds better than it actually is for someone not running a full station</p><p>my current setup is an IC-7610 which obviously has the dual receiver built in so i already do some S&P on the sub while running on the main, but actual SO2R with two radios and all the band switching and audio management seems like a completely different animal. ive talked to a couple guys at the club who do it and they say the learning curve is pretty brutal and it actually tanks your rate initially before it gets better</p><p>anybody gone through this transition and have thoughts on whether the juice is worth the squeeze for someone doing maybe 10-15 contests a year but not trying to win any plaques or anything, just trying to improve</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4949</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 21:06:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R actually worth the headache or am i overcomplicating things</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4928-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-or-am-i-overcomplicating-things/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests for a few years now, mostly single op single radio, and my rates are decent but i keep hitting this ceiling around 120-130 qso/hr on phone and maybe 80-90 on cw during the good runs. been reading a lot about SO2R and honestly it sounds like it could help but also sounds like a massive rabbit hole i might not come back from.</p><p>my current setup is a K3 and an Alpha 91b and i do alright with that but adding a second radio and figuring out all the antenna switching and interstation interference stuff feels like a project that could eat a whole winter. my station isnt exactly optimized for it either, i have a pair of 40m wires and a tribander at 55ft, not exactly a SO2R dream.</p><p>the thing is i watch the claimed scores from guys at my skill level who run SO2R and the difference is real, like sometimes 30-40% more qsos. but i also wonder how much of that is just them being better operators in general, not the second radio. does anyone actually track this stuff? like did you go SO2R and see a measurable rate improvement that you could clearly attribute to the second radio vs just getting more experience over time?</p><p>also whats the minimum viable SO2R setup, like can i get most of the benefit without building a full bandpass filter farm and replacing all my feedlines with hardline or whatever</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4928</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 15:08:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R rate optimization &#x2014; am I overthinking the band switching timing?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4904-so2r-rate-optimization-am-i-overthinking-the-band-switching-timing/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing SO2R for a few years now but i feel like my rates are still way below where they should be. running two IC-7300s and a bandmaster controller with a pair of hex beams stacked at different heights. the setup works fine electrically, no bleedthrough issues or anything like that anymore after i finally got the filtering sorted.</p><p>what im struggling with is the actual operating strategy — like when to commit to running a frequency vs when to S&P on radio 2. i feel like i spend too much time babysitting radio 2 and losing momentum on the run frequency. in the last CQWW SSB i had a solid run going on 20m at like 150/hr and i kept dropping down to 40m on radio 2 to grab mults and every time i came back to 20 i had to rebuild the pile. it took like 3-4 QSOs before things got moving again each time.</p><p>is there a sweet spot for how long to let the run frequency coast while you work radio 2? or is this just something you kind of develop feel for over time. ive read the K1TTT and N6TR writeups but they seem to assume a level of automation i dont have yet with my setup</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4904</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R actually worth the headache for casual contesters?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4881-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-for-casual-contesters/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests for maybe 4 years now, mostly single op on 20 and 40, usually end up somewhere in the middle of the pack for my category and im fine with that. but lately ive been reading more about SO2R and i guess im trying to figure out if its something worth pursuing or if the complexity just eats into the time you'd otherwise spend actually making contacts.</p><p>my current setup is an ic-7300 and a pretty decent dipole situation, nothing fancy. i have an older ts-570 sitting on the shelf doing nothing and i keep thinking maybe i could press it into service as a second radio. the antenna switching and the audio routing seems like it would be a nightmare though, both radios would be fighting over the same dipole unless i get a second antenna up which isnt trivial at my QTH.</p><p>does anyone actually run SO2R without a full station setup and still come out ahead versus just working S&P more aggressively on one radio? like is there a breakeven point where the overhead is worth it or am i just romanticizing something that makes sense for the big guns but not for a mid-tier operator like me</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4881</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:05:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R timing during a pileup &#x2014; when do you actually switch radios</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4873-so2r-timing-during-a-pileup-when-do-you-actually-switch-radios/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing SO2R for a few years now and i feel like im still not getting the rate i should be during the busy hours. like the concept makes sense, you work a station on radio 1, while youre waiting for the exchange you're hunting on radio 2, fine. but in practice when the pileup is deep on radio 1 and youre running 150+ an hour it feels like switching at all just kills momentum.</p><p>my setup is two K3s, one into a stack of 4el yagis at 60ft, the other into a dipole so the antennas are at least somewhat isolated. audio is mixed with the DVK handling the CQ cycles. the issue is more operational than hardware at this point i think.</p><p>do you guys actually run SO2R hard during a good run or do you basically just babysit radio 1 until the rate drops? ive heard some guys say they only seriously use radio 2 when they drop below like 80/hr on radio 1 but that seems like leaving a lot on the table during slower periods</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4873</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R worth the headache for casual contesters or just leave it to the serious guys</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4838-so2r-worth-the-headache-for-casual-contesters-or-just-leave-it-to-the-serious-guys/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests pretty seriously for the past couple years, mostly single op single radio, and im consistently pulling decent rates on CW but i keep hitting this wall where i feel like im just sitting there waiting during the slow periods and watching the clock. a buddy of mine keeps telling me to get into SO2R and honestly ive been curious for a while but every time i start looking into it the rabbit hole gets deep fast.</p><p>right now running a k3 into a pair of tribanders stacked at 45 and 75 feet, so the antenna situation isnt terrible, but adding a whole second radio setup with the keying and audio switching and all that seems like a lot of pain for maybe a few hundred extra qsos. or maybe im underselling it. does the rate difference actually show up that much if youre not already in the top 10 percent of operators skill wise? feels like my rate problems are more about operating technique than radio count</p><p>also wondering if anyone has opinions on the SO2R vs just really optimizing the single radio strategy, like aggressive S&P mixed with running, knowing when to give up a frequency and go hunt instead. i feel like theres still a lot of room there i havent exploited yet</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4838</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R worth the hassle for a casual contester?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4823-so2r-worth-the-hassle-for-a-casual-contester/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests for a few years now, mostly single op on 20 and 40, and my rates are decent but i keep hitting a wall around 150-160 qso/hr during the good runs and then it just falls off when the band gets crowded or i need to find mults. been reading a lot about SO2R and watching some of the webinars from the big guns and i get the theory — keep radio 1 running on a run frequency and use radio 2 to hunt mults or grab a second frequency on another band for when the rate dies. but honestly setting it up looks like a pain. the audio switching alone seems like it would drive me nuts, and i havent even thought about the bandpass filter situation yet.</p><p>my current setup is a K3 and an IC-7300 sitting there mostly unused, so i technically have the hardware already. i use N1MM+ for logging. has anyone here actually made the jump to SO2R from a similar starting point and was it worth it for the kind of contest where you're not trying to win the world, just improve your score and have more fun during the slow periods? or is this one of those things where it only really pays off if you're seriously competing for a plaque?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4823</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:43:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R during contests - is it actually worth the headache</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4790-so2r-during-contests-is-it-actually-worth-the-headache/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been running single op for years now, usually do okay in the sprints and state QSO parties but i keep getting crushed by the SO2R guys and i finally decided to look into it seriously this past winter. spent about two months reading everything i could find and honestly im more confused than when i started.</p><p>my current setup is a K3 as the main radio and i have an older FT-950 collecting dust in the corner that i could theoretically use as the second radio. the interstation interference is what scares me most — my antennas are an 80m dipole and a 40m dipole up about 40 feet, which arent exactly optimally decoupled. i know guys running stacked yagis with 60dB of isolation between bands but thats not my situation at all.</p><p>the bigger question im wrestling with is whether the rate improvement actually justifies all the complexity. like even if i get the hardware working, now im managing two VFOs, two loggers, trying to run a frequency on radio 1 while SandP-ing on radio 2, and my brain is already fried after 6 hours of single radio contesting. anyone gone through this transition and have honest thoughts on whether it was worth it or not</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4790</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:20:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R without losing your mind &#x2014; any tips for managing rate during contest runs?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4773-so2r-without-losing-your-mind-any-tips-for-managing-rate-during-contest-runs/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing SO2R for a few years now but i still feel like im leaving a ton of points on the table especially during the middle hours of a contest when propagation is shifting and i cant decide whether to keep running on 20 or start hunting on 40. the two radio setup itself isnt really the problem anymore, got the interlocks sorted out and the audio routing is mostly fine, but its more the mental side of it — like knowing when to actually pull the trigger and start a run on radio 2 versus just S&P'ing around while radio 1 holds the frequency.</p><p>anyone have a system for this? i feel like the rate meter is lying to me half the time. running at 80/hr looks great until you realize 15 opened up and you missed the whole thing because you were babysitting a dying 20m run. also curious if anyone has opinions on when to just abandon a frequency and go full S&P on both radios. feels wasteful but sometimes it just makes sense.</p><p>using wintest btw if that matters, and my second radio is just a backup rig so the keying overlap stuff is still a bit janky</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4773</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:10:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SO2R worth the headache for casual contesters or just stick with S&P?]]></title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4762-so2r-worth-the-headache-for-casual-contesters-or-just-stick-with-sp/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests on and off for a few years now, mostly phone, some CW. usually just do single op single radio search and pounce, maybe mix in some running when the rate is there. did okay in last years sweepstakes, nothing crazy but respectable score for my station.</p><p>been reading a lot about SO2R lately and honestly im not sure if its something i should even bother with or if its just for the guys with giant contest stations and dedicated setups. my current station is an IC-7610 which technically can do some of that with the dual receivers but its not the same as two completely separate radios and antennas obviously. the interference between the two radios when both are transmitting is what i keep reading is the real pain to sort out.</p><p>my main question is really about the rate side of things — like at what point does running vs S&P actually make sense? i know the conventional wisdom is if you can hold a run frequency and get more than like 2-3 qsos per minute consistently then run, but i feel like in the middle of a contest when rates are fluctuating that math changes constantly. anyone have a practical feel for when to switch strategies mid contest?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4762</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:57:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R finally clicked for me last weekend &#x2014; some thoughts</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2455-so2r-finally-clicked-for-me-last-weekend-some-thoughts/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so i've been trying to wrap my head around SO2R for like two years and something finally just clicked during the state QSO party last weekend. i think the big thing i was doing wrong was treating the second radio like a full-time thing instead of just a rate tool. like i was trying to actively work stations on both radios simultaneously and it was just chaos, missed exchanges, blown multipliers, the whole mess.</p><p>what actually helped was just using radio 2 strictly for S&P while i was running on radio 1. find a mult, pounce on it when there's a gap in the run, then get back to running. sounds obvious but when youre actually in the chair under pressure it doesnt feel obvious at all. also had to spend some time with the SO2R interlock settings in N1MM because i kept accidentally transmitting on both which... yeah dont do that.</p><p>anyway curious if anyone has tips for when the run rate drops and you start to wonder if you should flip which radio is the run radio. i never really have a good feel for when to pull that trigger. sometimes i switch and it helps, sometimes it just costs me time and the old run freq dies while im getting established on the new one.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2455</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R worth it for casual contesters or just overkill?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4164-so2r-worth-it-for-casual-contesters-or-just-overkill/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests for maybe 3 years now and im starting to hit a wall with my scores. been running single radio, mostly S&P with some CQ runs when the band opens up nicely. last CQWW i did about 800 QSOs on SSB and felt like i left a lot on the table, especially during the slower periods where i was just sitting there waiting for callers.</p><p>a buddy of mine runs SO2R and says it completely changed his contest experience, like he can keep his rate up by hunting mults on the second radio while the first one is just sitting there between contacts. makes sense in theory but im not sure my station is ready for it or if i even have the headspace to manage two radios at once during a 48 hour event. i already feel like im juggling enough just keeping the log, watching the cluster, and trying to not miss dupes.</p><p>anyone gone through this transition and was it actually worth the hassle? and whats the minimum you'd really need to do it properly without just causing a mess of intermod between the two rigs</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4164</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:45:05 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R during SS &#x2014; worth the headache or am i overcomplicating things</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2962-so2r-during-ss-worth-the-headache-or-am-i-overcomplicating-things/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing sweepstakes CW for a few years now, always single radio, and i keep seeing these ridiculous scores from the SO2R guys and wondering if im leaving way too many points on the table. my station is two K3s, a pair of 2el yagis on 20 and 40 stacked on the same tower, and i do have two amps but i've never actually tried running both radios at the same time in a contest.</p><p>the interference between the two rigs is what scares me off honestly. i know people use bandpass filters and stuff but i dont really understand how guys are managing to transmit on one radio while listening on the other without just blowing their ears out or desensing everything. do you need the antennas on completely separate towers to make this viable or can you get away with the shared tower setup if the bands are far enough apart?</p><p>also just the operating itself — like the mental load of keeping a run going on one radio while S&P on the other seems like it would just destroy my rate, at least at first. anyone have a realistic sense of how long it took them to get comfortable with it? i feel like i'd spend the whole contest fumbling around and end up with a worse score than if i'd just stayed single radio.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2962</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R - is it actually worth the hassle for a casual contester?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/788-so2r-is-it-actually-worth-the-hassle-for-a-casual-contester/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests for maybe 3-4 years now, mostly single op on 20 and 40, sometimes dabble in 15 when conditions cooperate. been hearing a lot about SO2R setups and how much it can improve your rate but honestly every time i look into it i get overwhelmed by the station engineering side of things. the filtering alone seems like a nightmare if your antennas are close together.</p><p>my current setup is an <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=icom-7300" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">IC-7300</a> and a secondhand <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=kenwood-ts-590sg" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">TS-590SG</a> that i picked up last year for exactly this reason but havent really committed to making it work properly. i tried running both during the last CQ WW phone and nearly blew my mind trying to manage the audio feeds and keep track of which radio was which. maybe im just not wired for it or maybe i havent found the right logging software integration yet. im running N1MM+ and i know it has SO2R support but the configuration took me an afternoon and still felt janky.</p><p>is there some point where the rate improvement actually shows up or is it really only worth it if youre already making like 150+ Qs an hour on radio 1 and you have dead time to fill? curious what people who actually use it regularly think, not looking for the "just try it" answer because i did try it and it was a mess lol</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">788</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 04:04:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R worth the hassle for casual contesters or is it overkill</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3922-so2r-worth-the-hassle-for-casual-contesters-or-is-it-overkill/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests seriously for maybe 3 years now and i keep reading about SO2R and watching videos of these high rate stations and honestly it looks insane. like how are these guys even keeping track of two radios at once while logging and calling CQ and listening for dupes. my brain hurts just thinking about it.</p><p>right now im running a single K3 into a 2el yagi on 20 and a trapped vertical for 40/80, nothing fancy. i usually end up somewhere in the middle of the pack on the 3830 scores for my category. been thinking about picking up a used <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=icom-7300" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">IC-7300</a> or maybe a second K3 if i can find a deal, and trying to actually do SO2R properly for next years CQ WW.</p><p>but like, is the rate improvement actually worth setting up all the band switching stuff, the antenna switching, the SO2R controller, dealing with RFI between the two radios... it seems like you could spend more time managing the complexity than actually working stations. anyone here actually done the switch from SO1R to SO2R and have thoughts on whether it was worth it? and how long did it take before it stopped feeling like patting your head and rubbing your stomach at the same time</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3922</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:47:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R actually worth the headache? been going back and forth on this for a while</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3219-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-been-going-back-and-forth-on-this-for-a-while/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing single op contesting for a few years now, mostly on 40 and 20, and i keep hearing guys talk about SO2R like its the holy grail but every time i try to wrap my head around the actual setup it just seems like a massive amount of complexity for... what exactly? like yes i get that youre running on one radio while the other is finding the next contact but in practice how much rate improvement are we actually talking about?</p><p>my current setup is a k3 into a 4el yagi on 20 and a dipole on 40, nothing exotic. heard you basically need two complete stations with good isolation between them which means bandpass filters and probably a SO2R controller box and i dunno, at some point arent you just adding failure points. had a buddy who spent the whole first night of sweepstakes chasing an RFI problem between his two rigs instead of actually operating</p><p>the guys putting up big numbers in the single op category, are they mostly SO2R or is it possible to be competitive doing single radio if your rate discipline is really good? genuinely asking because i dont want to spend money on a second radio if the real gains are just in operating smarter on one</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3219</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R actually worth it or am i just making things harder for myself</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2672-so2r-actually-worth-it-or-am-i-just-making-things-harder-for-myself/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests for about 4 years now, mostly single op, and i keep reading about SO2R being the big rate multiplier everyone uses to stay competitive. finally decided to try setting it up last contest season and honestly it was kind of a disaster at first. kept transmitting on the wrong radio, had the audio routing all confused, and i think i called CQ on 40 while actively in a QSO on 15 which was embarrassing.</p><p>eventually got it somewhat dialed in by the end of the weekend but my rate actually went DOWN compared to my single radio efforts which i did not expect. i know theres a learning curve but im wondering if people think the investment in time and gear is really worth it for someone doing maybe 10-12 contests a year, or if im better off just squeezing more out of a single radio setup first. im running an <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=icom-7300" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">IC-7300</a> and a K3S right now with some bandpass filters between them, station isnt perfect but its workable. audio is going through a headphone mixer thing i cobbled together.</p><p>anyone gone through this same learning curve and come out the other side actually seeing the rate gains people talk about? or is SO2R mostly only worth it if you're already top 10 material and trying to push from like 2000 QSOs to 2500?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2672</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R worth the headache for a mid-level contester?</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3053-so2r-worth-the-headache-for-a-midlevel-contester/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing contests seriously for maybe 3 years now, usually finish somewhere in the middle of the pack in my category and i keep reading about SO2R and how it transforms your rate but honestly every time i look into it i feel like im opening a can of worms. the station complexity, the filtering issues, the second radio bleeding into everything... i dunno.</p><p>currently running a K3 and an old FT-950 that i picked up cheap, so i technically have two radios. the antenna situation is two yagis stacked for 20/15 and a wire for 40/80. my main concern is the RFI between the two rigs when both are transmitting even on different bands. i ran some tests just playing around and the second radio totally craps out when the first one is keying up on 20.</p><p>is SO2R actually worth pursuing or am i better off just focusing on single radio rate optimization? feels like i could squeeze more out of my operating technique before adding the complexity. but then again i see guys posting 1200+ QSO rates in phone contests and i cant figure out how theyre doing it without SO2R.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3053</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R during sprint contests &#x2014; is it even worth the headache</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2415-so2r-during-sprint-contests-is-it-even-worth-the-headache/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been running SO2R for a couple years now mostly on the bigger contests like SS and CQWW but lately i've been wondering if the setup overhead is actually worth it for the shorter sprints. like the NA Sprint specifically. the rate swings are so violent in that contest that by the time i've got the second radio tuned up and locked in on a run freq i feel like i already missed 3 or 4 QSOs on the first radio.</p><p>my current setup is a K3 and an <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=icom-7610" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">IC-7610</a> going into a DX Engineering NCC-2 and a bandpass filter stack from 4O3A. interlock is handled through a microHAM SO2R box. it all works fine, the interlock is solid, no RFI issues i can hear anyway. but the cognitive load during a sprint just feels different than a 48 hour contest where you have time to settle into a rhythm.</p><p>anyone who actually runs SO2R in sprints have any tips or is this one of those situations where the juice isnt worth the squeeze and i should just focus on rate on radio 1 and use radio 2 for band checks only</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2415</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:27:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R finally clicked for me this weekend &#x2014; some thoughts</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4034-so2r-finally-clicked-for-me-this-weekend-some-thoughts/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so i finally had a decent SO2R run during the state QSO party this weekend and i think something finally clicked after like two years of fumbling around with it. gonna try to dump my thoughts here while theyre fresh.</p><p>the biggest thing for me was stop trying to actively operate both radios at the same time. sounds obvious but i kept trying to like, consciously manage both and it just falls apart. what actually works — at least for me — is treating radio 2 as a background process. you set it hunting on a second band while youre running on radio 1, and you only switch when you hear something that sounds solid. not every call, not every weak signal, just the ones that sound like a real QSO is gonna happen fast.</p><p>rate-wise i was doing maybe 80-90/hr on 40m and grabbing another 15-20 multipliers off 15m on radio 2 without really killing my run rate. not world class numbers obviously but for a single op in a modest station that felt pretty good.</p><p>the other thing i finally got consistent about is the footswitch setup. having the SO2R controller mapped to the footswitch so i can flip audio focus without touching the keyboard made a huge difference. seems like a small thing but when youre in a rhythm every second matters.</p><p>anybody else have tips for pushing rate higher without just brute forcing it? im running an K3 and an old FT-1000MP with a shared antenna situation so there's some compromises i have to work around.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4034</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 05:51:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R actually worth the headache? thinking about setting it up for next contest season</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3372-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-thinking-about-setting-it-up-for-next-contest-season/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing single op for a few years now and my rates are decent but i keep watching the top scores and wondering how much of that gap is just SO2R vs actual skill. like i know the top guys are also just better operators but the second radio thing has to be a significant chunk of it right?</p><p>my current setup is a k3 and i have an older <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=kenwood-ts-590sg" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">ts-590</a> sitting on the shelf doing nothing. antenna situation is two yagis on the tower which is actually not terrible for trying this i think, the feedlines are already separate. my main worry is the intermod situation between the two radios when theyre both transmitting. ive heard horror stories about guys blowing up preamps or just getting so much garbage on the second receiver that its useless anyway.</p><p>is there a minimum filter investment before this is even viable or am i going to spend more on bandpass filters than the whole thing is worth? and does the SO2R actually translate to rate improvement for someone whos not already a top 10 operator or is it kind of wasted until you have the operating fundamentals so dialed in that the second radio is the actual bottleneck</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3372</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 22:17:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R actually worth the headache? thinking about setting it up</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2512-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-thinking-about-setting-it-up/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing single op for a few years now, mostly on 40 and 20 during the bigger contests like SS and CQ WW, and i keep seeing guys post ridiculous rates and when i look at their setups they're running SO2R. ive got a second radio sitting here doing basically nothing (old IC-756 pro) and my main rig is the 7300 so i started thinking about it.</p><p>the thing is every time i try to read about it i fall down this rabbit hole of bandpass filters, intermod issues, the antenna switching stuff, all the SO2R controllers like the microHAM or the N1MM integration and honestly my eyes glaze over. like i get the concept — you work a multiplier on radio 2 while radio 1 is in a pileup, or you search and pounce on one while running a frequency on the other — but actually setting it up without blowing up my front ends seems like a whole project.</p><p>is it actually making that much of a difference to peoples scores or is it more of a thing where it helps at the top end but for a mid-level operator it wont change much? i run maybe 600-700 qsos in a big contest right now and my rate during good conditions is decent but falls apart when band conditions shift. curious what people actually experience vs what the theory says</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2512</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:25:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Rate Optimization vs Multiplier Strategy in Modern Contests</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/370-rate-optimization-vs-multiplier-strategy-in-modern-contests/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I've been reading about how <cite index="1-2,1-3,1-4">SO2R is a must if you want to maximize your contest score, and rate versus multiplier strategy guides were useful before SO2R but not anymore.</cite> This got me thinking about how contest strategy has evolved.</p><p>In the "old days" you had to choose between running for rate or searching for multipliers, but with SO2R you can theoretically do both simultaneously. However, I'm finding that <cite index="7-9,7-10,7-11">it was a weekend of one radio CQing and the second radio always tuning, never really had two bands open enough to try 2BSIQ - it was old-fashioned SO2R.</cite></p><p>How do current top contesters balance rate optimization with multiplier hunting when propagation doesn't cooperate for true dual-band operation? Are there specific techniques for maximizing the efficiency of the "search and pounce" radio during slow periods on the run frequency?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">370</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SO2R during SS &#x2014; worth the headache or am I overcomplicating things</title><link>https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/822-so2r-during-ss-worth-the-headache-or-am-i-overcomplicating-things/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>so ive been doing Sweepstakes CW for the past few years as SO1R and honestly been pretty happy with it, typically finishing somewhere mid-pack in my section. but i keep reading about SO2R and watching the 3830 scores from guys who are clearly running two radios and the rate difference is just insane. like they'll have these huge multiplier hauls early and then just sustain a run rate that I can't match even on a good band opening.</p><p>my current setup is an <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=icom-7300" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">IC-7300</a> which is great but obviously only one radio. i do have an old <a href="https://www.hamradiobase.com/go.php?a=kenwood-ts-590sg" class="affiliate-link" rel="nofollow sponsored noopener" target="_blank">TS-590SG</a> sitting here that i pulled from the shack rearrangement last spring and never put back into regular use. so the hardware question is somewhat answered but everything else feels like a giant unknown. bandpass filters, SO2R controllers, antenna switching, figuring out how to not key up on myself... i dont even know where to start honestly.</p><p>is there a reasonable entry point into this or is it one of those things where you either go all-in with the full microHAM setup and dedicated antennas or you're just spinning your wheels? genuinely curious if anyone has done a more budget/scrappy version of SO2R that actually worked during a phone or CW contest.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">822</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
