dipole vs vertical for 40m — am i overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 99
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Rick Anderson 1 post
-
Andrew Martinez 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a couple weeks now and i think im just confusing myself at this point. currently have a 40m dipole up about 25 feet, fed with coax, nothing fancy. it works okay but i feel like im missing contacts especially to the west coast, im in ohio so that's like a 2000 mile shot or whatever.
a guy at the club keeps telling me to put up a vertical with radials and itll dramatically improve my low angle radiation for dx. which makes sense on paper. but ive also read that a dipole at low heights actually has a pretty high takeoff angle so maybe thats my problem more than the antenna type itself. if i could get it to 50 feet would that be worth more than switching to a vertical at ground level with a decent radial field.
i dont have a ton of space for radials anyway, yard is maybe 60x80 feet. just trying to figure out what the smart move is here before i spend money or time on something that wont actually help.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1016-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites