dipole vs vertical for 40m - is it even worth comparing
- Replies 1
- Views 58
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Bob Williams 1 post
-
Christopher Davis 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a while now and i cant really make up my mind. currently running a 40m dipole at about 25 feet which i know isnt ideal, its not a half wavelength up or anything close to it, but its what i can do with my yard situation. been getting okay results into europe from the midwest but low angle stuff is obviously suffering.
a buddy of mine keeps telling me to just put up a vertical with a decent radial field and call it a day for dx. he's using a hustler 6BTV and swears by it. but ive also read a million times that a dipole even at low heights often outperforms a vertical because of ground losses with verticals unless you really go all out with the radials. like 60+ radials worth of copper.
so what are you guys actually running on 40 and what do you find works better for working dx specifically, not ragchewing locally because i can do that on a wet string basically
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1037-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-it-even-worth-comparing/Share on other sites