NMO vs SO-239 for mobile VHF/UHF — worth the hassle of drilling?
- Replies 1
- Views 86
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Brown 1 post
-
Jennifer Williams 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a mag mount dual band for about two years on my truck and honestly its been fine but ive noticed the signal isnt as clean as id like especially when im doing linked repeater stuff where the other end is pretty far out. a buddy of mine keeps telling me to just drill through and do a proper NMO mount and yeah i know hes probably right but i keep putting it off because its a leased vehicle and also im just not confident about doing the drilling without screwing up the roof panel or the headliner.
anyway i finally started actually looking into it more seriously. the mag mount i have now is one of the comet ones, can't remember the exact model, sits on the roof centered pretty well. the antenna itself is a diamond NR770RNMO so technically its already NMO terminated but im just running it through one of those mag mount adapters. im losing some efficiency there i know.
has anyone done a through-hole NMO on a leased truck and lived to tell about it? or is there a lip mount or gutter clip option that actually performs close to a true roof mount without the drill? i dont really want to hear about the hatch mount solutions because the truck is a crew cab and it just doesnt work geometrically for me
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1137-nmo-vs-so239-for-mobile-vhfuhf-worth-the-hassle-of-drilling/Share on other sites