JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 51
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jennifer Lee 1 post
-
David Chen 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
7.078 is right for JS8Call, thats the standard calling freq for that band. the problem is activity is just way lower than FT8, its not even close. you might sit there for 20 minutes and see nothing th
-
yeah PSK31 nostalgia is real lol. i ran that mode heavily like 2009-2014 and there were always people to ragchew with on 14.070. now that waterfall is mostly quiet except for some RTTY contest activit
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i love it for the DX chase but honestly it gets kind of hollow after a while. you exchange signal reports and grid squares and thats... it. i started poking around JS8Call because someone at the club mentioned it lets you actually type back and forth in something resembling a real QSO and i set it up last weekend but the waterfall looks totally dead on 40m at the times im operating (usually late afternoon, maybe 5-7pm local)
is JS8Call just not very populated compared to FT8 or am i doing something wrong with the frequency? i was sitting on 7.078 which i thought was the JS8 calling freq but maybe thats wrong. also my decode rate seems lower than FT8 even accounting for the slower mode — not sure if thats a soundcard issue or just how it is. running an IC-7300 into a dipole, nothing fancy
i still fire up WSJT-X for FT8 when i want to work a new grid but would really like to find something with a bit more... substance i guess. even PSK31 back in the day felt more like a real contact than modern FT8 grinding
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1422-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites