my inverted V is way down compared to my old vertical, what am I missing
- Replies 1
- Views 91
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Amanda Thomas 1 post
-
John Peterson 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
35 feet on 40m is pretty low honestly, youre looking at a high angle radiator at that height which is great for NVIS and regional contacts but anything over say 800 miles and the vertical is probably
-
I had almost the exact same situation a couple years back. went from a ground mounted vertical to an inverted V and thought something was broken for weeks. turned out my expectations were just off. th
so ive been running a 40m inverted V for about three months now, apex at maybe 35 feet off a push up mast, legs going out at roughly 45 degrees and ending about 8 feet off the ground. resonant on 40, SWR is fine, radio is happy. but compared to my old hustler vertical with 4 radials that I used last year I feel like im losing signals left and right. guys who were 59 before are now like 55-56 and I feel like im running QRP when im not.
the inverted V should theoretically be better or at least comparable right? lower angle for DX maybe not but for domestic stuff it should do okay. im in a suburban lot so the vertical was always kind of squeezed in next to the fence anyway. ive checked connections at the feedpoint, coax looks good, balun is a homebrew 1:1 choke type wound on a FT240-43. not sure what else to check. maybe the angle of the legs? or is 35 feet just not high enough for a real low angle radiation pattern on 40.
anybody run both and have a feel for how they compare
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1431-my-inverted-v-is-way-down-compared-to-my-old-vertical-what-am-i-missing/Share on other sites