inverted V vs flat top dipole — worth the hassle of getting it flat?
- Replies 1
- Views 71
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
David Chen 1 post
-
Nancy White 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
honestly for casual use the difference is probably not going to blow your mind. the inverted V does have a bit more high angle radiation which isnt ideal for dx but for domestic contacts it can actual
-
i switched from inverted V to a flat top last summer and tbh the difference wasnt dramatic but i did notice slightly better signal reports on the longer paths, like into europe from the midwest. but m
so ive been running an inverted V for 40m for about two years now, center point is maybe 35 feet up on a fiberglass pole and the legs slope down to about 8 feet at each end. works ok, gets me in the log, but ive always wondered if i was leaving something on the table by not getting it up as a flat top.
problem is my yard isnt great for supports — i'd have to get creative with the fence posts on one side and there's a tree on the other end that might work but its kind of an awkward height, maybe 28 feet? so the antenna wouldnt even be truly flat, it'd be more like a slight droop in the middle or id have to run it at an angle across the yard which puts it near the house.
is the difference actually noticeable in real world use or is this one of those things thats like 1-2 db on paper and basically nothing in practice? i mostly work domestic, some casual dx when conditions cooperate, not contesting seriously or anything.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1475-inverted-v-vs-flat-top-dipole-worth-the-hassle-of-getting-it-flat/Share on other sites