JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 45
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michael Rodriguez 1 post
-
Brian Wilson 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
yeah JS8Call takes some getting used to, the decode threshold is actually a bit higher than FT8 by design because the messages are longer and more free-form so the codec has more work to do. if you're
-
attic dipole at 25w and you're working europe on FT8 on 20m, thats actually pretty solid honestly. i ran a similar setup for two years before i could put something outside. i tried JS8Call a few times
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for contacts and the waterfall is satisfying to watch but i keep reading about JS8Call and how its supposed to be more like actual conversation over weak signal paths. finally installed it last week and honestly im a little confused about the workflow compared to WSJT-X. like the timing grid feels more relaxed which i get is the point but im not sure im decoding everything i should be.
for context im on a IC-7300 into a fan dipole in the attic, not ideal i know, and im usually running 25-30 watts because neighbors. on FT8 i can work 20m pretty reliably into europe from the midwest. on JS8Call im seeing stations but the decode rate feels lower, not sure if thats a config thing or just the nature of the mode. is there a setting im probably missing or is this just how it is and you kinda have to be patient with it.
also totally unrelated but does anyone still run PSK31 regularly, i fired up fldigi the other day just for nostalgia and there were actually a few guys on 14.070 which surprised me
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1509-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites