SO2R actually worth the headache? thinking about setting it up for the next major contest
Loading...
- Replies 1
- Views 41
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jessica Johnson 1 post
-
Sarah Collins 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
yeah the antenna isolation thing is real and you cant just wing it, at least not without some pain. ive tried running SO2R with a shared antenna system and the intermod just kills you, especially if b
-
honestly i tried SO2R last CQWW and kind of gave up on it midway through sunday because i was spending so much mental energy managing the second radio that my CW on the run radio got sloppy and i star
so ive been doing single op for a few years now and my rates are decent, usually pulling 800-1000 QSOs in a 48 hour phone contest if condx cooperate but ive been reading about SO2R and honestly im not sure if the complexity is worth it for someone at my level. like yes i understand the basic concept, one radio running, one radio searching for mults or new guys to work, but the antenna isolation part is what keeps tripping me up in my head.
right now i run an IC-7300 and i have an old FT-950 sitting on the shelf that i could press into service. the problem is my antennas are all on the same feedline selector and i only have a tribander and a 40m dipole. trying to transmit on two bands simultaneously with that setup seems like it would just be RF chaos. do people actually run SO2R with modest antenna setups or do you basically need a dedicated antenna for every band you want to operate on at once? also curious how folks handle the audio, does it just become second nature to monitor two radios or does it mess with your head after a few hours?
not looking to win anything, just want to squeeze more rate out of the same operating time
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1720-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-thinking-about-setting-it-up-for-the-next-major-contest/Share on other sites