- Replies 1
- Views 38
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michael Rodriguez 1 post
-
Steve Martinez 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a ground mounted vertical for 40m for about two years now and its been okay, works decent for DX surprisingly but local stuff kind of sucks which i guess is expected. anyway my neighbor is letting me use one of his big trees to put up a dipole and the tree is probably... 45 feet? maybe a bit more. ive read a million times that a dipole at a half wavelength is the gold standard or whatever but 45 feet on 40m isnt even close to that. so im wondering if its even worth the effort of putting up the dipole or if i should just leave the vertical alone. the vertical has 32 radials which took me forever to lay down so its not like its a bad antenna, im just curious if the dipole would actually give me something different or better. mostly do ragchews and occasionally try to work some DX when condx are good.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1749-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-height-thing-really-that-big-a-deal/Share on other sites