- Replies 1
- Views 38
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
James Williams 1 post
-
Amanda Johnson64 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
honestly this is one of those things where the answer is genuinely frustrating — it depends. a vertical with a bad radial system will likely lose to your dipole every time, no contest. ive seen guys p
-
the radial thing is way overstated imo, or at least people make it sound more complicated than it is. i just buried a bunch of wire in my yard over a couple weekends using one of those lawn edger tool
so ive been running a simple 40m dipole at about 30 feet for a couple years now and it works fine, gets me contacts, no real complaints. but i keep reading about how verticals have this low angle radiation that's supposedly better for dx and im starting to wonder if im missing out.
the thing is i live on a small lot and putting up a proper ground radial system seems like a huge pain. ive seen guys say you need like 16 minimum to make a vertical actually work right and some say 32 or even 64 for best performance. my yard isnt even big enough to do that without the radials running under the fence into the neighbor's yard which seems like a weird conversation to have.
so my question is basically — is a well-installed vertical with a decent radial field actually going to outperform my dipole for working europe from the midwest, or is the difference kind of overstated online. the dipole is broadside roughly northeast-southwest so it does favor that path at least somewhat. just wondering if anyones actually done a real comparison or if this is one of those endless debates that never gets settled
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1838-wire-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-vertical-really-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites