- Replies 1
- Views 81
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jessica Miller 1 post
-
Michael Moore99 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
js8call is genuinely different from ft8 in a way that took me a while to appreciate. its not trying to do the same thing. ft8 is basically just exchange callsigns and signal reports as efficiently as
-
i tried js8call for a few weeks and kept coming back to ft8 just because theres way more activity. js8 feels a bit like showing up to a party and theres like 4 people there. when someone IS on it can
so ive been running ft8 for about a year now and i enjoy the contacts but honestly it feels a bit like watching a slot machine, you spin it and either get a qso or you dont, theres not really any... conversation happening. heard about js8call from a guy at my club who uses it for emcomm stuff and apparently you can send longer messages back and forth, almost like a slow text message over hf.
my question is whether its actually worth setting up alongside wsjt-x or if the bands are just too dead on js8 frequencies to make it practical. im on 20m most evenings and occasionally 40m when 20 goes long. i've got a pretty basic setup, ft-891 into a trapped vertical, nothing fancy, maybe 100w out. i can decode ft8 signals way down in the noise which is great but im wondering if js8 needs more oomph or if its similar sensitivity-wise.
also is there any reason not to just leave both running at the same time on different vfos or does that cause issues with the audio interface? i only have one signalink usb so im guessing that might complicate things
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1927-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-it/Share on other sites