- Replies 1
- Views 32
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jessica Davis 1 post
-
Michelle Lewis 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about two years now mostly on 20m and 40m with a dipole in the attic and around 50w, and yeah it works great for getting contacts but lately i feel like its kinda... hollow? like you just exchange grid squares and signal reports and thats it, nobody actually says anything to each other
started looking at JS8Call because at least you can have a real conversation and it still has decent weak signal performance, the protocol is built on the same foundation as FT8 basically but slower and you can actually type a sentence. has anyone run both for a while and can tell me if JS8Call is actually usable for ragchewing or is it just too slow to feel natural
also curious how it compares on like actual sensitivity, i know FT8 gets down to like -24dB or whatever but does JS8Call get close to that or do you give up a lot there. running WSJT-X for FT8 right now and the waterfall setup is already there so the jump to JS8Call hopefully isnt too bad
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1938-js8call-vs-ft8-for-low-power-stuff-which-are-you-actually-using/Share on other sites