- Replies 1
- Views 19
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Robert Chen 1 post
-
John Wilson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a while now and cant quite make up my mind. currently running a 40m dipole at about 25 feet which i know isnt ideal but its what i can do with my lot. getting okay results into europe from the east coast on most evenings but nothing to write home about. a buddy of mine keeps telling me i should just put up a vertical instead and use the radial field to make up for the low height, says hell get out better with his gap titan than i do with the dipole.
thing is i feel like 25 feet on 40m is only like a quarter wavelength up which puts the takeoff angle pretty high, so maybe the vertical argument actually makes sense here? but then i also read somewhere that a vertical without a decent radial system is basically a dummy load so im not sure which problem is worse — low dipole or vertical with mediocre radials.
anyone actually done a direct comparison on 40 or 80 at low heights? not looking for a perfect answer just curious what people have actually experienced
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2136-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-height-thing-really-that-big-a-deal/Share on other sites