our ARES group did a simulated disaster drill last weekend — some things went really wrong (in a good way?)
Loading...
- Replies 1
- Views 21
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Robert Chen 1 post
-
Amanda Jackson 1 post
so we finally got around to doing a full scale simulated disaster exercise with our county ARES group, something we'd been putting off for like two years honestly. the scenario was a major flood event that took out the repeater infrastructure and we had to coordinate between the EOC, two shelters, and a mobile command post using only simplex HF and some VHF simplex on 146.52.
i want to share what went wrong because i think thats more useful than the stuff that worked. first — and this is embarrassing — half our operators showed up not knowing their go-kit battery situation. like they assumed everything was charged from whenever they last used it. we had one station that was basically dead within 45 minutes. second thing, net control kept reverting to using jargon and abbreviations that the newer operators just didnt understand, which caused some real confusion when we were trying to pass simulated health and welfare traffic.
the HF side actually went better than i expected. we had solid winlink connectivity through a distant RMS gateway when local stuff was unavailable, which was the whole point of the exercise. but getting people comfortable with that ahead of time is crucial, a few folks had never actually sent a real winlink message before the drill which... yeah.
anyway curious if others have run similar exercises and what surprised you. also wondering how other groups handle training for the operators who only show up occasionally — thats our biggest headache right now.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2405-our-ares-group-did-a-simulated-disaster-drill-last-weekend-some-things-went-really-wrong-in-a-good-way/Share on other sites