js8call vs ft8 for actually having a conversation — is it worth setting up
Loading...
- Replies 1
- Views 58
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
James Park 1 post
-
James Anderson 1 post
so ive been running ft8 for about a year now and yeah its great for contacts and filling in the map but honestly after a while it starts to feel like youre just clicking a button and watching a computer talk to another computer. not much operating skill involved if im being honest with myself.
someone at the club last month mentioned js8call and said its basically ft8 but you can actually type messages back and forth, relay stuff through other stations, even do some basic messaging over hf without internet. that actually sounds interesting to me. my setup is pretty modest, ic-7300 into a trapped vertical, so im not running a kilowatt or anything, but ft8 contacts usually arent a problem even at 50 watts.
my question is kind of twofold i guess — is js8call actually used enough that youd find other stations to talk to on a random weeknight, and is the weak signal performance close enough to ft8 that id still get through when band conditions are marginal? i know its a wider bandwidth mode so im assuming the sensitivity isnt quite the same but i dont really know the numbers off the top of my head.
also still have a soft spot for psk31 but man that waterfall is a ghost town compared to what it used to be. feels like everyone just migrated to ft8 and never looked back.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2507-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-is-it-worth-setting-up/Share on other sites