- Replies 1
- Views 38
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Morse Coder 1 post
-
Steven Clark 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for racking up contacts and the weak signal stuff is genuinely impressive, like i worked a station in japan last week with maybe 5 watts and a dipole that definitely isnt optimized for 17m, but at the end of the day you're basically just exchanging signal reports and grid squares and thats... it. doesnt really feel like ham radio to me sometimes, more like a slow ping utility.
anyway i started messing around with JS8Call last month and its a completely different vibe. you can actually say something to another station, have a back and forth, send store-and-forward messages through relay nodes, whatever. the tradeoff is obviously the mode is way less sensitive than FT8 — JS8 at normal speed is supposedly around -16 or -17 dB S/N compared to FT8 which is what, -24 dB? so you're giving up a good chunk of that weak signal margin.
my question is whether people actually use JS8Call regularly enough on the bands that you can find activity without just sitting there waiting. i check 14.078 sometimes and its pretty quiet compared to the FT8 watering holes. is there a better time of day or a net or something im missing? also running WSJT-X and JS8Call at the same time on the same radio, is that asking for trouble or do people do it routinely with a virtual audio cable setup?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2516-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-the-tradeoff/Share on other sites