- Replies 1
- Views 11
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
David Johnson45 1 post
-
Linda Johnson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been doing single op assisted for a few years now, mostly phone contests but getting more into CW, and my rates are decent but i keep hitting this ceiling where i just cant seem to push past like 80-90 Qs an hour sustained even when conditions are good and the band is hopping. been reading a lot about SO2R and wondering if thats the missing piece or if im just leaving other stuff on the table first.
my current setup is a K3 into a tribander at 45ft plus a 40m wire, pretty standard stuff. i run N1MM and have bandmap going but honestly i dont think im using it as efficiently as i could. like i know the theory of running a frequency while S&P on a second radio but the implementation seems like it would just fry my brain trying to manage two radios, two antennas, the audio switching, all of it at once.
is there a point where you kind of have to commit to SO2R to be competitive or is there still room to optimize single radio operation a lot more? curious what people who actually run SO2R think about the learning curve vs rate improvement. also any tips on just general rate optimization even without a second radio would be appreciated because i feel like theres probably low hanging fruit im missing
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2620-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-trying-to-improve-my-contest-rate/Share on other sites