- Replies 1
- Views 27
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
203
SN
101
A
5
K
0
Quiet
X-Ray
C4.0
Wind
374.8 km/s
Aurora
1
Updated 23:30 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for working DX and filling out the log but honestly it feels more like a video game than actual radio sometimes. you click a callsign, the macros do everything, you get a contact logged and thats... it. no real exchange, nothing personal about it.
started poking around JS8Call last week and the concept is interesting to me — like it uses the same underlying weak signal encoding but youre actually typing messages back and forth, almost like a very slow text conversation. latency is rough obviously and youre not gonna ragchew the way you would on SSB or even PSK31 but at least theres a human on the other end doing something.
my question is does anyone actually use JS8Call regularly or is it kind of a ghost town on most bands. ive seen a few stations pop up on 40m around 14078 or wherever the usual spot is but activity seems sparse compared to the FT8 watering holes. wondering if its worth learning the software quirks or if im just gonna be calling CQ into the void most of the time. already run WSJT-X for the ft8/ft4 stuff and i know JS8Call is a separate install so not a huge deal just want to know if the activity is there before i dig in
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3620-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-conversation-is-it-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites