- Replies 1
- Views 5
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
201
SN
126
A
14
K
1
Quiet
X-Ray
C2.9
Wind
382.2 km/s
Aurora
2
Updated 17:00 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for working new entities and all that but every time i try to actually talk to someone its just the standard exchange and done. i get it thats kind of the point. but lately ive been reading about JS8Call and it seems like the idea is you can have a real QSO using the same weak signal tech underneath it.
tried it last weekend on 40m and the waterfall looked completely dead compared to what FT8 looks like. maybe 3 or 4 signals visible the whole session. so my question is — is JS8Call just not popular enough to be usable or am i looking at the wrong times, wrong bands? i was on around 7.078 which i think is the standard dial freq but honestly not sure if thats even right anymore.
also still have WSJT-X running on the side and i noticed my FT8 decode rate dropped a bit, guessing thats a cpu thing. running on a pretty old laptop. anyway the main thing is i want to know if JS8Call is worth sticking with or if its kind of a dead end activity wise
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4241-ft8-vs-js8call-for-actual-twoway-conversation-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites