wire dipole vs vertical for 40m — which one actually works better in practice
Loading...
- Replies 1
- Views 9
- Created
- Last Reply
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a while now and figured id just ask here because i keep reading contradictory stuff online. im running a modest setup, IC-7300 into a LDG tuner, and right now i have a half wave dipole for 40m strung up inverted-V style about 30 feet at the apex. its fed with RG-8X into the shack. works okay i guess but im wondering if a vertical would do better for DX since ive read a bunch of times that verticals have a lower takeoff angle and thats better for longer paths.
the thing is i also read that verticals need a decent radial system or they just suck up the RF into the ground and you lose half your power anyway. and i dont really have the yard space to bury like 60 radials or whatever the recommendation is. i was thinking about one of those trap verticals or maybe even just a simple quarter wave with like 4 or 8 radials elevated a couple feet off the ground.
current dipole does get me into europe from the midwest pretty regularly on 40 when conditions are up but im wondering if im leaving contacts on the table. anyone actually compared these two antenna types head to head at their own station? not looking for theoretical stuff, just real world experience from people who have actually used both.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4329-wire-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-which-one-actually-works-better-in-practice/Share on other sites