- Replies 1
- Views 16
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
201
SN
101
A
14
K
1
Quiet
X-Ray
C3.3
Wind
372.6 km/s
Aurora
2
Updated 19:30 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for racking up contacts and working new entities but honestly it feels more like a video game than radio sometimes. you click a callsign, the software does everything, you log a contact with someone you never actually talked to. i dont know, maybe im being a snob about it.
anyway i stumbled onto JS8Call a few months back and the concept seemed cool — basically the FT8 weak signal magic but you can actually type back and forth with someone. been trying to get it set up properly on my IC-7300 with the built in USB audio and it mostly works but i keep seeing decode errors on my end even when the SNR looks fine. running WSJT-X for FT8 on the same setup with zero issues so its something specific to JS8Call i think. anyone else notice the decode threshold is noticeably worse than FT8? feels like i need a stronger signal to get a clean decode
also is there even enough activity on JS8Call to make it worthwhile or is it kind of a ghost town these days
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4461-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-conversations-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites