- Replies 1
- Views 10
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
203
SN
101
A
5
K
0
Quiet
X-Ray
C5.0
Wind
319.6 km/s
Aurora
1
Updated 22:00 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
so ive been doing SS phone and CW for about four years now and keep finishing in the middle of the pack for my section. decent rate in the first few hours then it just dies off and i end up S&P-ing for the last six hours which is painful. a buddy of mine keeps telling me SO2R is the answer but honestly setting it up looks like a nightmare and im not sure my antennas are spaced far enough apart to even try it without everything bleeding into everything else.
current setup is a K3 and an IC-7300, so the hardware is theoretically there if i add a second amp and sort out the interlocking so i dont key both at the same time. but like... does the rate improvement actually justify rebuilding basically my whole station? i've read the N6TR and K1ZM stuff on SO2R and it sounds great in theory but those guys have serious stations. anybody running SO2R from a suburban lot with compromise antennas actually seeing a meaningful rate bump or is it mostly diminishing returns unless you're already running a kilowatt into a stack?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4620-so2r-during-sweepstakes-is-it-actually-worth-the-headache/Share on other sites