- Replies 1
- Views 8
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jessica Thomas 1 post
-
Paul Wilson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and yeah its great for working new entities and all that but honestly it started feeling kind of hollow after a while, like youre just clicking buttons and logging callsigns. somebody on a local net mentioned JS8Call and i downloaded it last weekend to mess around with it.
and now im kind of confused because on one hand JS8Call seems way more like actual communication, you can type stuff back and forth, there's relay functionality, store and forward, you can even do some basic APRS-like position stuff i think. but on the other hand the decode sensitivity doesnt seem anywhere close to FT8 and i feel like im comparing apples to oranges here. like they're solving different problems.
my question is i guess — for weak signal work specifically, like trying to reach someone across a noisy path or through marginal conditions, which one actually performs better in practice? i understand FT8 was designed around sensitivity but JS8Call has different speed settings too so im not sure how the slower modes compare. running an ic-7300 into a dipole at about 35 feet if that matters.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4966-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-qsos-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites