NMO vs SO-239 for mobile VHF/UHF — worth drilling the roof?
- Replies 1
- Views 77
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Mark Johnson 1 post
-
Emily Brown 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a mag mount for about two years now on my truck, just a basic dual band whip, works ok but i keep reading that a proper NMO through-the-roof mount is way better and i'm starting to believe it after messing around with the numbers a bit. the mag mount sits on the roof towards the back and honestly the swr is fine, like 1.3 or so on 2m and a bit worse on 70cm but nothing alarming. but i notice when im driving through hilly terrain i get a lot of dropouts talking to the local 147 repeater and i'm wondering if a solid ground plane from a real NMO would actually make a difference or if my dropouts are just terrain and i need to accept that.
truck is a 2019 F-150 and yes i know drilling feels scary but ive done it on older vehicles before. the other option i was looking at was one of those lip mounts or a hatch mount but i heard those can mess with your ground plane even more than a mag mount. anyone actually done a side by side comparison? also debating between a larsen nmo150/450 and just going with a diamond mr77 or something. not sure if the antenna choice matters as much as the mount at this point.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/784-nmo-vs-so239-for-mobile-vhfuhf-worth-drilling-the-roof/Share on other sites