40m dipole vs vertical — what am i missing here
- Replies 1
- Views 64
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
James Moore18 1 post
-
Angela Washington 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
yeah that tracks with my experience honestly. the vertical noise thing is real — they pick up local QRM like crazy unless you have a really clean RF environment. 30 feet isnt exactly ideal for a dipol
-
same thing happened to me when i put up a hustler 6btv a few years back. everyone talks about low angle radiation but nobody mentions it also receives every switching power supply and led driver in a
so ive been running a 40m half wave dipole at about 30 feet for the past couple years, fed with coax through a 1:1 balun, nothing fancy. works ok, maybe 3-4 S units above the noise on most contacts. last month i put up a vertical — a trap vertical that covers 40 through 10 — just to see what the difference would be like because i kept reading about how verticals are supposedly better for DX due to the lower takeoff angle and all that.
honestly? the vertical is noisier on receive and i feel like im giving up signal on most paths i actually use. tried running a decent radial field, like 16 radials cut to roughly quarter wave, not perfect but not bad either. the dipole just seems to punch better on nearby stuff and honestly holds its own even on some of the longer haul contacts into europe. im in the midwest so maybe thats part of it, i dunno.
is there something wrong with my setup or is this a normal experience? i see so many people swearing by verticals for HF and im just not seeing it on 40. would love to hear if anyone has actually done a real comparison side by side.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/805-40m-dipole-vs-vertical-what-am-i-missing-here/Share on other sites