SO2R actually worth the headache for a casual contester?
- Replies 1
- Views 53
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Kevin Park 1 post
-
Helen Taylor 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
honest answer — yeah there's lower hanging fruit first. SO2R done right is probably a 10-15% rate improvement for a mid-tier station and setup but the overhead to get it working cleanly is substantial
-
the interlock thing is what bit me when i first tried it. forgot to properly configure the keying interlock in N1MM and briefly had both rigs keyed up at the same time into antennas that were not well
so ive been doing contests for a few years now, mostly single op on 20 and 40, and i keep reading about SO2R and how the top guys are running two radios simultaneously to keep their rates up during the slow periods. i get the concept — while youre waiting for a pileup to thin out on one band you can be running a freq or SandPing on the other. sounds great in theory.
but honestly every time i try to wrap my head around the actual setup it gets complicated fast. like youre dealing with antenna switching, bandpass filters so the two radios dont blow each others front ends out, the audio mixing so you can monitor both without going crazy, keying interlocks so you dont transmit on both at the same time... its a lot. my current station is just an IC-7300 into a tribander at 35 feet, pretty modest.
my rates during SS and CQWW are decent i think, usually pulling 80-100/hr during the good runs and then it falls off a cliff during the slow hours. is SO2R realistically going to help someone at my level or am i better off just working on my CQing technique and search and pounce efficiency first? feel like theres probably lower hanging fruit before i go full tilt on a second radio setup.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1271-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-for-a-casual-contester/Share on other sites