dipole vs vertical for 40m — is the height difference really that big a deal
- Replies 1
- Views 62
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Mike Rodriguez 1 post
-
Daniel Taylor 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
25 feet for a 40m dipole isnt doing you any favors for DX thats for sure, youre right about the NVIS thing. but i'd be careful assuming the vertical is automatically better. i put up a 43 foot vertica
-
I've run both and honestly for 40m the answer is kind of "it depends on the path." The vertical wins on DX paths where you need that low takeoff angle but the dipole will smoke it on regional stuff an
so ive been running a half wave dipole for 40m for about two years now, center fed with 450 ohm ladder line into a balanced tuner. its at about 25 feet which i know isnt ideal but its what the trees allow. been thinking about swapping to a vertical, probably a quarter wave with a decent radial field, partly because i want to try some low angle DX and the dipole at that height is basically just an NVIS cloud burner.
thing is ive read a lot of conflicting stuff. some people swear by verticals for 40 and 80 DX, others say unless you have like 60 radials and its over saltwater its not worth it. my yard situation means i could probably put down 20-30 radials but not much more than that. is there actually a noticeable difference in practice or am i chasing something that wont pan out
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1531-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-height-difference-really-that-big-a-deal/Share on other sites