- Replies 1
- Views 41
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michelle Brown 1 post
-
Emily Williams 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a end-fed halfwave on 40 for about a year now and its fine i guess but i keep reading that a proper dipole is supposed to be noticeably better and i cant tell if thats actually true or if its just the usual antenna religion stuff you see online. my situation is i have a pretty small suburban lot, maybe 60 feet of usable horizontal space if i angle it a bit so a full size 40m dipole would need to be bent into an inverted-v or something which i've done before on other bands but never 40.
the alternative i've been kicking around is a vertical with some radials, i've got room to put one in the back corner of the yard and lay out maybe 8-10 radials without my wife noticing too much. i know verticals have a lower angle of radiation which is supposed to be good for dx but i'm mainly working stateside so i'm not sure that even matters for my use case.
anybody run both and actually compared them? not looking for theoretical stuff just real world impressions. does the vertical on 40 actually sound as noisy as people say or is that overblown
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1694-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-hassle-worth-it/Share on other sites