Contest rate optimization: Running vs S&P balance
- Replies 2
- Views 103
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ham Fan 24 1 post
-
Jennifer Adams 1 post
-
Emily Thomas 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
A wise ham once said "RATE is KING" • There is no wasted time while Cqing, increasing RATE - but I'm struggling with the decision of when to abandon a run frequency and go S&P during contests. Last weekend in ARRL DX CW, I held 14.025 for 3 hours with declining rate from 120/hr down to 40/hr. Planning to work the bands that are open, follow the band openings. If two band are open work the one that closes first, then move to the other.
At what point do you guys switch from running to S&P? Is there a mathematical threshold (QSOs/hour) that makes it worth giving up frequency? I'm using WriteLog with packet spots, so I can see multiplier activity, but the rate vs. multiplier balance is confusing me.
Also wondering about band-change strategy - Research the propagation predictions for the contest operating time. There are plenty of websites and tools available to assist you. Use one during the contest to monitor the propagation patterns. How frequently should I check other bands during a good run?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/236-contest-rate-optimization-running-vs-sp-balance/Share on other sites