- Replies 1
- Views 22
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
James Brown 1 post
-
David Wilson59 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a pretty standard 40m dipole for about two years now, center fed with some leftover coax I had lying around, ends tied off to a couple trees maybe 30 feet up at the apex. works fine, no complaints really. but i keep reading about how verticals clean up low angle radiation and are supposedly better for DX and i cant decide if thats actually worth anything in practice or if its just marketing stuff people repeat.
the thing is i have a decent sized backyard and could probably put up a quarter wave vertical with a decent radial field, maybe 30 or 40 radials buried just under the surface. but thats a lot of work and i already have a functional antenna. my noise floor is somewhere around S4-S5 depending on the band and time of day which i know isnt great, most of it seems local, some switching power supply garbage from the neighbors.
so my actual question is — has anyone done a real back to back comparison between the two on 40m specifically, not just theory. does the vertical actually pull in more DX at the expense of local stuff or is this one of those things that sounds better on paper
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3290-40m-dipole-vs-vertical-is-the-vertical-actually-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites