Rate Optimization vs Multiplier Strategy in Modern Contests
- Replies 2
- Views 129
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
HF Hunter 1 post
-
Michael Thomas87 1 post
-
Michelle Brown 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
The use of SO2R enables the proficient operator to listen to the second radio in at least 3 out of the 4 moments of a QSO, and thus maximize multipliers. SO2R is an infinite series of 3 seconds, where
-
The real skill is in recognizing when to prioritize rate over multipliers in real-time. During major contests, I use spotting data to identify multiplier opportunities between CQs, but when the rate d
I've been reading about how SO2R is a must if you want to maximize your contest score, and rate versus multiplier strategy guides were useful before SO2R but not anymore. This got me thinking about how contest strategy has evolved.
In the "old days" you had to choose between running for rate or searching for multipliers, but with SO2R you can theoretically do both simultaneously. However, I'm finding that it was a weekend of one radio CQing and the second radio always tuning, never really had two bands open enough to try 2BSIQ - it was old-fashioned SO2R.
How do current top contesters balance rate optimization with multiplier hunting when propagation doesn't cooperate for true dual-band operation? Are there specific techniques for maximizing the efficiency of the "search and pounce" radio during slow periods on the run frequency?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/370-rate-optimization-vs-multiplier-strategy-in-modern-contests/Share on other sites