dipole vs vertical for 40m — is the difference really that big in practice?
Loading...
- Replies 1
- Views 7
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Amanda Williams 1 post
-
Andrew Jackson 1 post
so ive been running a 40m half wave dipole at about 30 feet for a couple years now and its done fine, worked plenty of dx, no real complaints. but ive been reading a lot lately about verticals and how they have a lower takeoff angle which is supposedly better for dx and i'm starting to second guess myself a bit.
thing is my yard isnt huge and putting up a full size vertical with a proper radial field sounds like a whole project. ive seen guys say you need like 32 or even 64 radials for a decent ground mounted vertical and thats just not happening in my backyard without my wife having a long talk with me about the lawn. anyone actually done a real comparison between the two? like not just theoretical stuff from the antenna books but actual on-the-air results where you could tell a difference.
also wondering if an elevated vertical with just a few radials is a reasonable compromise or if you really do take a big hit without the full ground system. my dipole is only at 30 feet which isnt great for 40m but it works, so im trying to figure out if the grass is actually greener here or if its just antenna envy.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/3851-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-difference-really-that-big-in-practice/Share on other sites