- Replies 1
- Views 7
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
203
SN
101
A
5
K
0
Quiet
X-Ray
C5.0
Wind
319.6 km/s
Aurora
1
Updated 22:00 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
so ive been running FT8 for about 8 months now and i get it, its great for the quick contact and the DX you can work is insane compared to anything else ive tried on HF. but it always kind of felt hollow to me, like i worked a guy in Kazakhstan and then... thats it. no exchange, nothing. just signal reports and grid squares.
a buddy at my club mentioned JS8Call and said its basically the same weak signal thing but you can actually type back and forth like a real QSO. so i downloaded it and set it up last weekend. and yeah its genuinely pretty cool. slower obviously but you can actually have a conversation. worked a few guys on 40m in the evening and we talked about antennas and weather and whatever for like 20 minutes. felt way more like ham radio to me personally.
anyway my question is more about the technical side of it. is JS8Call actually as sensitive as FT8 or is it a compromise because of the longer messages? i know FT8 can pull stuff out of the noise that you just cannot hear at all, wondering if JS8 gives that up to allow the free-text format. also curious if anyone runs both simultaneously on different bands or is that asking for trouble with the sound card setup.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4263-ft8-vs-js8call-for-actual-twoway-conversation-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites