- Replies 1
- Views 6
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
201
SN
126
A
14
K
1
Quiet
X-Ray
C4.3
Wind
398.1 km/s
Aurora
1
Updated 11:30 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
so ive been running FT8 pretty heavily for the past year or so, got a decent log going, worked a bunch of DX on 40 and 20m with pretty modest power (running about 25w into a dipole up maybe 30 feet). its been great for propagation monitoring and just racking up contacts but honestly after a while it starts to feel a little... hollow? like youre not really talking to anyone, just exchanging grid squares and signal reports and thats it.
anyway i started poking around with JS8Call and the concept is really interesting to me — using the same WSJT-style weak signal encoding but actually being able to type messages back and forth. the latency is kind of brutal though, like a full exchange can take a few minutes and if the band shifts mid-QSO you just lose it. has anyone stuck with it long enough to find a regular group or net to work with? feels like the activity level is pretty sparse compared to FT8 on a busy evening.
also curious how it compares to just running PSK31 which i used to do a lot back in the day. PSK31 you could actually have a real chat but you needed maybe 10-15dB more signal to make it work reliably. is JS8Call actually filling that middle ground or am i just romanticizing it
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4582-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-the-tradeoff/Share on other sites