dipole vs vertical for 40m — am i overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 61
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Jennifer Walsh 1 post
-
Michelle Garcia 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for like two months now and i think i need someone to just tell me im wrong or right. my situation is a suburban lot, maybe 60x120 feet, house in the middle, trees on the back property line that go up maybe 40 feet or so. neighbor on the south side is close, maybe 15 feet from my fence.
i was planning on putting up a half wave dipole for 40m, inverted vee style, fed at about 35 feet from one of those trees. the ends would slope down toward the corners of the yard. the math works out okay i think but the southeast leg would be running kind of toward the neighbors house and end up only like 8 feet off the ground near the fence.
so now im second guessing and wondering if a vertical with a decent radial field would actually outperform that on low angles — like for working dx on 40. ive read a ton of conflicting stuff. some people say a low dipole is basically a cloud warmer and useless for dx, others say its fine. ive got access to a MFJ antenna analyzer and an nec2 modeling program but honestly i havent sat down and actually modeled it yet which i should probably just do.
anyone run both and have a real opinion? not looking for a definitive answer just want to hear what people actually experienced
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4646-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites