- Replies 1
- Views 7
- Created
- Last Reply
☀
Solar
SFI
201
SN
126
A
14
K
1
Quiet
X-Ray
C4.3
Wind
398.1 km/s
Aurora
1
Updated 11:30 UTC
HamQSL · N0NBH
Day
80/40m Poor 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Good
Night
80/40m Good 30/20m Good 17/15m Good 12/10m Poor
Callsign Lookup
_
Vanity Call Signs Available
Enter filters above and click Search.
ⓘ Callsign lookups are in real time via the FCC database.
Vanity callsign availability is refreshed daily at 6:00 AM CST.
The vanity search may be unavailable for a few minutes during this update.
So ive been running a mag mount diamond on the roof of my truck for about two years now and honestly it works fine but i keep reading that NMO is the way to go for a permanent install. The mag mount does slide around a bit in the car wash and i had one close call where it almost came off on the highway so maybe its time.
My hesitation is obviously drilling a hole in a truck i still owe payments on. The lip mount option seems like a decent middle ground but i talked to a guy at the club last week who said lip mounts introduce a ground plane problem because youre not actually bonded to the roof properly. Is that actually a noticeable thing on VHF/UHF or is he being overly particular about it? Like for everyday 2m and 70cm use hitting the local repeaters im not sure it would matter much.
Also if i do go NMO what feedline should i be running — the truck cab is pretty tight and i dont want a huge connector situation under the headliner. Currently using whatever coax came with the mag mount which i suspect is garbage anyway.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4647-nmo-mount-vs-lip-mount-for-dual-band-mobile-worth-drilling-the-hole/Share on other sites