- Replies 1
- Views 2
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Brazil Ham 1 post
-
Emily Johnson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a while and i figured id just ask here since there's people who've actually tried both. i have a pretty standard 40m dipole up about 30 feet, fed with coax, nothing fancy, works fine for local stuff and some regional contacts but i feel like im missing DX that other guys in the area seem to be working with no problem.
a buddy of mine runs a vertical on a ground mounted radial field and swears by it for DX on 40, says the low angle radiation beats a dipole at that height every time. and yeah theoretically i get it, a dipole at 30ft on 40m is only like 0.2 wavelengths up so it's more of a NVIS cloud-burner than a DX machine. but ive also read plenty of stuff saying a good dipole can still compete if the vertical has a mediocre radial system.
my question is really whether its worth pulling the dipole down and putting up a vertical, or if i should just try to get the dipole higher. getting it higher is kind of a pain because of my lot layout but not impossible. the vertical option would be easier to install but id have to lay radials which is also a whole project. anyone gone through this same decision?
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4689-40m-dipole-vs-vertical-which-actually-performs-better-at-low-angles/Share on other sites