JS8Call vs just using FT8 for low power stuff — anyone actually compared these side by side?
Loading...
- Replies 1
- Views 1
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Packet Radio 1 post
-
Thomas White 1 post
so ive been running FT8 for about two years now and i get it, its great for weak signal work and all that, but it feels kind of... soulless? like you set up WSJT-X and just let the computer do everything. i made a contact in New Zealand last week running 5 watts off my G5RV and yeah that was cool but i wasnt really doing anything, the software just handled it.
anyway someone at the club mentioned JS8Call and i downloaded it but honestly im not sure what im looking at. its based on FT8 encoding right but its more like actual conversational messaging? the latency seems like it would be annoying for a qso though. i tried calling CQ on 40m last Tuesday around 9pm local and got nothing for like 45 minutes so im wondering if the bands were just dead or nobody is actually using it anymore.
also curious if anyone still runs PSK31 regularly. i know its not as sensitive as FT8 by a long shot but at least you can type in real time and it feels more like an actual contact. my old ft-950 has a built in waterfall on the display which makes finding PSK signals pretty easy but i havent heard much activity on the usual 14.070 area lately. maybe everyone just moved to FT8 and thats just the reality now.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4745-js8call-vs-just-using-ft8-for-low-power-stuff-anyone-actually-compared-these-side-by-side/Share on other sites