- Replies 1
- Views 21
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Sarah Thompson 1 post
-
Amanda Johnson64 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a 40m dipole inverted-V style for about two years now, apex at around 35 feet which i know isnt ideal but its what i can do with the trees i have. it works fine for local and regional stuff, decent on 7.200 area but anything over about 1500 miles gets inconsistent. i get into the midwest from the southeast pretty reliably but the west coast is hit or miss and dx is mostly miss unless conditions are screaming.
been thinking about putting up a vertical, probably something like a trap vertical or maybe just a dedicated 40m quarter wave with a decent radial field. read a bunch about how verticals have lower takeoff angles which should help with dx but then you hear just as many guys saying their dipole blows away their vertical and im going back and forth on this. part of the problem is i dont have a lot of room to lay down a good radial field either, maybe 20-25 radials at 16 feet each which i know isnt textbook.
anybody actually done a real a/b comparison on 40m between these two? not looking for theoretical stuff, just what you actually heard on the band.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/4832-40m-dipole-vs-vertical-fed-up-with-the-tradeoffs-just-want-opinions/Share on other sites