APRS igate vs digipeater — do i actually need both running at home?
- Replies 1
- Views 90
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Miller 1 post
-
Kevin Miller 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been messing around with APRS for a few months now and got my TNC-Pi talking to direwolf on a raspberry pi and everything seems to be working, im seeing packets come in on aprs.fi and i can track my car when im driving around which is cool. but now im reading about igates vs digipeaters and im starting to confuse myself.
from what i understand the igate just pushes packets to the internet (APRS-IS) and the digipeater actually retransmits RF packets so other stations can reach further. i've been running mine as RX-only igate mostly because i didnt want to cause interference or mess anything up while i was still learning. but my coverage area is kinda rural and theres a gap between two digipeaters that my path sometimes falls into and i lose tracking for like 20 minutes on a drive.
would it make sense to enable digipeating on my setup or is that something that needs more thought about paths and stuff? i dont really wanna cause QRM or be the guy who breaks everyones packets. also does anyone run a combined setup without issues or is it usually better to keep them separate
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5077-aprs-igate-vs-digipeater-do-i-actually-need-both-running-at-home/Share on other sites