dipole vs vertical for 40m — is the height thing really that big a deal
- Replies 1
- Views 55
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
John Johnson 1 post
-
Christine Lee 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been going back and forth on this for a few weeks now and figured id just ask here because the usual google rabbit holes arent helping. im putting up my first real HF antenna and the lot isnt huge — maybe 80 feet usable in one direction. i can get a 40m dipole up at about 25 feet if i use the house and a tree, or i could build a vertical with some radials in the corner of the yard.
everyone says dipoles need to be at half wavelength height to really perform but 25 feet is nowhere near that on 40. so is it even worth it over a vertical at that point? ive read that verticals radiate low angle which is good for DX but they also pick up more noise? my noise floor here is already kind of rough, S4-5 on a quiet evening. just want to work some decent DX and maybe some stateside stuff, not trying to win contests or anything.
also if i go vertical im thinking a homebrew quarter wave with maybe 16-20 radials on the ground, not elevated. is that enough or do i need like 60+ to make it competitive with the dipole
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5085-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-height-thing-really-that-big-a-deal/Share on other sites