JS8Call vs FT8 for actual two-way conversations — am i missing something
- Replies 1
- Views 103
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Michael Brown 1 post
-
David Anderson74 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
okay so ive been running FT8 for about a year now and i get it, its great for working new countries and the SNR performance is honestly magic sometimes. pulled a ZL2 last week at like -21dB which i still cant quite believe. but theres something that bugs me about it — its not really a conversation right? its just exchanging callsigns and signal reports and then youre done. feels a little like a slot machine sometimes.
so i started poking around JS8Call because i heard it was built on the same engine basically, like the JS8 waveform is derived from FT8 but with longer transmit windows and you can actually type messages back and forth. been messing with it for a couple weeks and the activity on 40m seems decent enough, especially in the evenings. the relay/store-and-forward thing is interesting too.
my question is — for people who use both, is JS8Call worth putting real time into or is it kind of a niche thing that never really took off? and does anyone actually use it for emcomm type purposes or is that more theoretical at this point. my setup is pretty basic, IC-7300 into a fan dipole, running WSJT-X for FT8 and the JS8Call client for the other. audio interface is a SignaLink.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5218-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actual-twoway-conversations-am-i-missing-something/Share on other sites