SO2R actually worth the headache for casual contesters?
- Replies 1
- Views 50
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ashley Wilson95 1 post
-
Daniel Garcia 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been doing contests seriously for maybe 3 years now, mostly single op on 20 and 40, and my rates are decent but i keep hitting this wall around 100-110 qsos/hr during the good runs and i cant figure out if the ceiling is me or my setup. been reading a lot about SO2R lately and honestly it seems like a massive rabbit hole before you even get to the operating part.
my current setup is an ic-7300 and a ft-891 that i use for mobile, so technically i have two radios but making them play nice without cooking each other or my ears seems like a whole separate project. ive seen guys running full SO2R with band decoders and antenna switching matrices and it looks more like an engineering project than a ham radio setup. is the rate improvement actually significant enough for a guy doing like 5-6 contests a year to justify that investment, or is this more of a serious competitor thing where you're trying to shave points off a top-10 finish?
also curious if anyone has opinions on whether improving CW speed or just working on S&P vs run strategy would give me more bang for the buck before i go down the SO2R rabbit hole. feels like there might be lower hanging fruit i'm missing.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5289-so2r-actually-worth-the-headache-for-casual-contesters/Share on other sites