finally pulled the trigger on an IC-7300 — some thoughts after a few weeks
- Replies 1
- Views 36
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Mark Johnson 1 post
-
Ashley Brown 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running an old FT-450D for probably 4 years now and always kinda wondered what i was missing. shack buddy kept telling me to upgrade but i was never really convinced the juice was worth the squeeze, you know? anyway i picked up a used IC-7300 off a guy in the club for a pretty decent price, he was moving up to an IC-7610 so the timing worked out.
first thing i noticed honestly was just how much better the waterfall is. i know everyone says that but i didnt really get it until i sat down during a pileup on 17m and could literally see who was transmitting and where they were sitting in the passband. made s&p way more efficient than i was used to. the built in ATU is fine, nothing special, but it gets the job done on my 40m dipole which is a bit short.
the real difference for me was weak signal work on 40 and 80. the noise floor just feels lower, or maybe its the filtering, im not totally sure which one is doing the heavy lifting there. i had a decent QSO with a station in Slovenia running maybe 50 watts on his end and it wasnt even a struggle, just comfortable copy the whole way through.
anybody else made a similar jump from an older mid-range rig? curious if the improvement was as noticeable for others or if i just got lucky with conditions that week.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5799-finally-pulled-the-trigger-on-an-ic7300-some-thoughts-after-a-few-weeks/Share on other sites