vertical vs dipole for 40m — am i overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 30
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
John Taylor 1 post
-
Brian Murphy 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
okay so ive been going back and forth on this for like two months now and i just need someone to tell me to stop agonizing over it. currently running a 40m dipole at about 25 feet, fed with coax, works fine, gets me contacts, whatever. but ive been reading about verticals and how they have a lower angle of radiation which is supposedly better for DX and now im second guessing everything.
my yard is not huge. i can fit a vertical easier than i can get a dipole any higher than it already is. the thing is, i keep reading that verticals need a really good ground radial system to be efficient and that sounds like a lot of work to bury a bunch of wire. is the low angle of radiation actually going to make a noticeable difference in real world use or is this one of those things that only matters on paper? i mostly work SSB, some digital, mostly stateside but would love to work europe more consistently.
not trying to start a dipole vs vertical holy war, i know people have strong feelings about this lol, just genuinely trying to figure out if its worth the project
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/5810-vertical-vs-dipole-for-40m-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites