dipole vs vertical for 40m — is the height difference really that big a deal
- Replies 1
- Views 33
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Amanda Miller 1 post
-
Jennifer Smith 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a 40m dipole at about 25 feet for the past year and a half and its been okay, worked a decent amount of DX with it but nothing spectacular. a buddy of mine keeps telling me to just put up a vertical and be done with it, says the low angle radiation will blow my dipole out of the water for DX. but then i read all this stuff about verticals needing a good radial system or they're basically just a dummy load, and i really dont have the yard space to lay out 32 radials or whatever the magic number is supposed to be.
my lot is pretty small, maybe 60x90 feet, and most of it is taken up by the house and a couple trees. i was thinking maybe 4 or 6 elevated radials on a vertical might work as a compromise? or am i better off just trying to get the dipole up higher, like maybe 40-45 feet if i can manage it. the trees are there and i could probably run a line up into one of them. the feedpoint would still be low tho.
not really sure what the right move is here. anyone dealt with a similar situation
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6061-dipole-vs-vertical-for-40m-is-the-height-difference-really-that-big-a-deal/Share on other sites