SO2R — is it actually worth the hassle or am I overthinking this
- Replies 1
- Views 10
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Karen Johnson 1 post
-
John Anderson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been doing single op contests for a few years now and im starting to hit a ceiling on my rates. i can get into the low 100s per hour during a good run but it feels like i plateau pretty fast once the initial pileup dies down. a buddy of mine keeps telling me SO2R is the answer but honestly every time i look into it i get kind of overwhelmed by the station complexity.
right now im running a k3 into a 2el yagi on 20 and a dipole on 40, pretty modest setup. the idea of adding a second radio and dealing with RFI between the two rigs just sounds like a whole weekend of troubleshooting waiting to happen. is there a sane way to ease into SO2R without completely rebuilding everything? or is it really more about operating technique than the hardware at this point.
also just curious — for guys who do it well, how much of your rate improvement came from SO2R vs just getting better at running a frequency and not wasting time between QSOs. because i sometimes wonder if my real problem is i let too much dead air happen between contacts and im blaming my setup instead of my technique
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/6702-so2r-is-it-actually-worth-the-hassle-or-am-i-overthinking-this/Share on other sites