JS8Call vs FT8 for actually having a conversation — worth it?
- Replies 1
- Views 84
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Ashley Miller 1 post
-
Thomas Anderson 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running FT8 for about two years now and honestly the contact logging side of it is great, worked a bunch of new entities and filled in a lot of band slots on logbook of the world which is cool. but lately its starting to feel like a slot machine more than amateur radio, you know? like im not actually talking to anyone, just exchanging signal reports and grid squares and then both move on.
someone at my club mentioned JS8Call and said it lets you have actual QSOs with weak signal capability similar to FT8. ive looked at it a little bit but the interface feels kind of clunky compared to WSJT-X and i wasnt sure if there was enough activity to make it worthwhile. my setup is nothing fancy, IC-7300 into a fan dipole up about 30 feet, so i can do most of the HF bands reasonably well.
is anyone actually using JS8Call regularly and finding contacts? or is it one of those modes where you fire it up and the waterfall is basically dead? also curious if the weak signal performance is actually comparable to FT8 or if thats kind of oversold. id be fine giving up a few dB if it means i can actually type a sentence to someone.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/1794-js8call-vs-ft8-for-actually-having-a-conversation-worth-it/Share on other sites