RemoteHams vs rolling your own remote setup — worth the hassle?
- Replies 1
- Views 75
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
David Davis44 1 post
-
Angela Turner 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running a remote station for about two years now using a combination of RemoteHams RCForb client and a SDR as a panadapter on the back end and honestly its been... okay. not great. the latency on the audio path drives me nuts sometimes especially when trying to work weak signal stuff on 40m at night. like youll hear a station come up and by the time your PTT registers through the internet link the guy is already done with his transmission and moved on.
i was talking to a guy at our club who basically rolled his own setup using a Pi, a couple of audio-over-IP bridges, and some custom scripting for the CAT control and he swears its lower latency than RemoteHams but i honestly dont know if its apples to apples because his station is only about 15 miles from his house and mine is like 350 miles away colocated at my brother in laws place in rural Oklahoma so the WAN hop alone is going to add jitter no matter what i do.
anyone running RemoteHams with a proper SDR on the RF side? im using an SDRplay RSPdx right now as the pan but thinking about whether it makes more sense to just send raw IQ over the link instead of dealing with the audio codec. has anyone actually tried that over a decent broadband connection? curious what kind of bandwidth that actually chews through at like 1MHz sample rate or whatever.
Link to comment
https://www.hamradiobase.com/forums/topic/2859-remotehams-vs-rolling-your-own-remote-setup-worth-the-hassle/Share on other sites